Kathleen Fischer’s Electronic Portfolio1. My first impression of her portfolio was that it was really busy, and I didn’t know where to look first. It didn’t look very well organized, but it seemed very interesting and stimulating. I liked all the colors she used, and how her picture is very real and not posed at all. I also liked that her resume was right on the homepage so it was easy to access.
2. Kathleen’s strengths are that she has a lot of credentials, and she seems very familiar with technology. She also provided images and visuals of her artifacts, and those helped intrigue me instead of just plain text. There are examples for each thing she includes, so this gives her credibility.
3. I can see that Kathleen is very active, and she definitely loves what she does. She’s also very creative, and an entrepreneur because she’s using ads to make money off of her portfolio. This shows the vastness of her ability, and how she might be able to help in positive ways at a school to use the resources available.
4. I would hire this person as a future teacher, because she seems very innovative and goal-oriented. She knows how to maximize her resources by making money off of her portfolio with the ads she’s using. She also seems very ready and willing to be flexible with people and new, unique programs.
Kye S. Hedlund’s Electronic Portfolio1. My first impression of Kye’s portfolio was that it is really bland, and lots of small text with no pictures. It didn’t capture my interest or attention, and the colors weren’t stimulating at all. It seemed to be time-consuming to read, and nothing that would really be beneficial to me as a reader.
2. Kye’s portfolio seems to have lots of useful and credible information, and it is organized well. His weaknesses are that he has too much text, no pictures, and no vibrant colors. This does not promote good visual literacy, and it doesn’t intrigue the reader. They would have to be reading for a purpose, and not just browsing.
3. Kye seems very professional, but not too innovative when it comes to his portfolio. I’m sure that he gets his point across, and he accomplishes his main goal of putting his resume and artifacts online. But most people would not be attracted or impressed by this kind of webpage. It is not attractive or pleasing to the eyes. I’m sure Kye gets things done, but is more old-fashioned and less open to change.
4. I would not hire this person because his webpage bored me. He could be interesting, but his portfolio does not portray that at all. I need something that is exciting and enthusiastic, and I most likely wouldn’t get to the bottom of his portfolio without being bored and needing something more exhilarating.
Angela Veenstra’s Electronic Portfolio1. I really liked Angela’s portfolio. The color scheme was good, and it seemed simple, but interesting. To open with a picture lets the reader get to know a little bit more about her, and have a visual to picture as they read her thoughts. She seemed very inviting and casual in her photos, but also professional with the way her portfolio is set up.
2. Angela’s strengths are that she did a good job with visual literacy, and her format is very organized and thorough. I liked that she had links to her blog and website, so if the reader wanted to learn more they wouldn’t have to look very hard. A weakness to her portfolio is that it’s the standard outline, and there’s nothing that jumps out to me about it. She could have put some more creativity into it, and really made an impact on whoever was reading it at the time.
3. Angela’s personality is conveyed as laid-back, relaxed, and sweet. She looks very approachable, but she gets the job done. She also portrays someone that works well with others, and can be innovative when put up to the challenge.
4. I would hire Angela because she seems very approachable, and willing to go above and beyond for others. She can organize, and create projects with thorough information. She also seems like an asset to any faculty or employer.
Jennifer Hedrick’s Electronic Portfolio1. Jennifer’s portfolio was very appealing and organized when I first look at it. She put up pictures not just of her, but of her with her students. This is very positive when it comes to working in a classroom. It shows that she has experience. I also liked the colors she used.
2. Jennifer has many strengths in her portfolio. She has links to her blog, resume, and other artifacts that she has created. It gives the reader some room to explore and get to know her a little bit more. She also included a lot of information about herself. A weakness is that she doesn’t have a lot to read other than her artifacts. By creating her webpage more interesting might make someone want to read and explore more.
3. From her portfolio, I think Jennifer is a very outgoing, interpersonal candidate for teaching. She included pictures of her smiling, and interacting with students. She seems to get along with others well, and will work hard to create an awesome product.
4. I would hire Jennifer because she could add a lot to the school, and can work to establish technology in the classroom. She has done a good job so far with her own webpage and portfolio.